9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (12) TMI 1904X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n India? - HELD THAT:- It is agreed position between the parties that the appellant being aggrieved by the above order of the Tribunal [ 2015 (5) TMI 760 - ITAT MUMBAI] had preferred appeal to this Court [ 2018 (9) TMI 231 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] . The above appeals were disposed of by this Court by setting aside the order of the Tribunal dated 1.4.2015 to the extent it had remanded the issue of per ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a for the Respondent ORDER 1. These appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( the Act for short) challenge the common order dated 21.2.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai ( the Tribunal for short). The common impugned order relates to the assessment years 2004-05, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11. Thus, the six appeals. 2. The appella ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case. This was by way of remand. 4. It is agreed position between the parties that the appellant being aggrieved by the above order dated 1.4.2015 of the Tribunal had preferred appeals to this Court being Income Tax Appeal Nos. 1198/15, 260/16 and 264/16. The above appeals were disposed of by this Court on 29.8.2018 by setting aside the order of the Tribunal dated 1.4.2015 to the extent it had ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
