2021 (9) TMI 353

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Shri R. Subramanya, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the issue involved in the present case is whether the appellant is entitled for exemption Notification No. 30/2004-CE. 2. The facts of the case are that though the appellant availed Cenvat credit on capital goods but not utilized and maintained the credit balance. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntendent (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 5. We have carefully considered the submission made by both sides and perused the record. The fact is not under dispute that though the appellant availed Cenvat credit on capital goods amounting to Rs. 1,20,603/- but they have not utilized the said amount for payment of duty and balance of credit so av .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee as under :- (a) Omkar Textile Mills Pvt Limited -2014 (311) ELT 587 ((Tri-Ahmd)) (b) CTM Textile Mills vs CCE Ahrnedabad- 2014(313) ELT 405 (Tri-Ahmd.) (c) Mangal Textile Pvt. Ltd. vs CCE Ahmedabad - 2014 (311) ELT 707 (Tri-Ahmd) (d) Modern Petrofils DTY Division vs CCE Vadodara - 2014 (313) ELT 545 (Tri-Ahmd) 3. It is consistently viewed by t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X