2004 (2) TMI 733

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 2. Apart from the fact that the impugned order is an interlocutory order, I am not inclined to entertain the petition because, in my opinion, the order does not cause any injustice to the petitioner. 3. By an application dated 20th October 2003, the petitioner (original defendant No. 1) made a prayer for recalling the plaintiff for further cross examination on the ground that the 'agre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... required to be proved in accordance with the provisions of the Evidence Act. Merely for administrative convenience of locating or identifying a document, it is given an Exhibit number in courts. Exhibiting a document has nothing to do with the proof though, as a matter of convenience, only the proved documents are exhibited. 4. It is therefore open to the petitioner defendant to contend at the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X