1985 (3) TMI 18

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... aid to arise out of the order of the Tribunal dated October 10, 1980. The facts of the case are that the assessee had contested the levy of penal interest under section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, before the Incometax Officer. The Income-tax Officer had waived the penal interest for all but one year. When an appeal was taken before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, certain directions were .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as to whether the interest was to be waived or not, but merely affirmed the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Later on, an application for rectification was moved stating that the counsel had not argued the question of penal interest on merits under the assumption that the preliminary objection was to be dealt with and this was a mistake. The learned counsel for the Revenue also af .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Mr. Wadhera urged that, in fact, the Tribunal had altered its original order by rectifying the same. According to him, the original order had affirmed the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and so there was no ground for rectifying the same. The real controversy, therefore, is whether the Tribunal merely held that the Appellate Assistant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X