9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (11) TMI 30X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cates. Respondents Through Mr. Anurag Ojha, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Shivam Malhotra, Advocate for R-4,5,6. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate for R-9 & 10. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal Adv., Vikrant Chawla Adv., Ayushi Bansal Adv., Vishesh Jagga Adv. for R-11. O R D E R The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. By way of the present Petition, Petitioner is seeking directions to Responden ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... IN of the Petitioner's Head Office in the State of Maharashtra or plant at Uttarakhand. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 in not amending the Bills of Entry as requested by the Petitioner vide letters dated 18th December, 2018, 28th January, 2019 and 1st December, 2020, the inaction on the part of R ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d prayer advanced by the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the Respondents No. 5, 6, 8 & 10 to decide the aforesaid letters written by the petitioner within twelve weeks in accordance with law. The Respondents shall give an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner before deciding the letters/applications filed by the petitioner. Needless to state that till ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
