9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (3) TMI 1376X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ch, 2011 and now it is not possible for the appellant to produce those records as those records are not available with the appellant - HELD THAT:- Reliance is placed by the ld. Counsel in the decision of RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [ 2020 (1) TMI 283 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] is not applicable to the facts of this case as in the said case the decision is with regard to adjudication ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1904 of 2019-SM, Excise Appeal No. 51905 of 2019-SM - -FINAL ORDER NOs. 50667- 50669/2020 - Dated:- 6-3-2020 - HON BLE MR. ASHOK JINDAL, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate for the appellant Shri K. Poddar Shri N. Chandra, Authorised Representatives for the respondent. JUDGEMENT ASHOK JINDAL: The appellants are in appeal against the impugned orders, wherein ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Commissioner (Appeals) the appellant shall produce the record is not possible. To support the case, she relied on the decision of the Hon ble Bombay High Court in Reliance Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India -2020 (1) TMI 283- Bom. High Court. 2. Heard the ld. Authorised Representative for the Revenue and perused the record. 3. Reliance is placed by the ld. Counsel in the decision of Relian ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
