Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (11) TMI 204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he second respondent at Annexure-'K' and has also sought for setting aside the recovery notice dated 18.09.2018issued by the respondent no.3 at Annexure-'M' and the letter dated 18.09.2018 at Annexure-'N'. The petitioner has also sought for refund of Rs. 4,00,000/- realised by encashment of bank guarantee at Annexure-'N1'. 2. The petitioner submits that it has imported certain capital goods under the Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) Scheme vide Notification No.102/2009-Cus dated 11.09.2009 and had also obtained clearance of the same. The assessable value of the capital goods was Rs. 91,11,494/- and benefit of duty that the petitioner had realised was Rs. 25,76,473/-. In accordance with the terms of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... F 58 dated 29.09.2016 filed with the Director General of Foreign Trade, Bengaluru. Accordingly, it was submitted that the export obligation was completed in the year 2013 and therefore, sale of capital goods in March, 2014 did not constitute violation of conditions present in the EPCG Notification No.102/2009 dated 11.09.2009. 6. It is further submitted that after its reply dated 30.06.2017, further notice came to be issued at Annexure-'M' pointing out non-fulfillment of conditions of bond executed to avail the benefit of EPCG Notification No.102/2009-Cus dated 11.09.2009. As is evident from Annexure-'M', bank guarantee has been invoked. Necessary communication to the bank authorities has been made as per the communication .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ause notice and decide the matter after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. In light of the direction made above, the action of invocation of bank guarantee by the respondent is set aside and the communication of the authority to the bank is held to be illegal as the same was issued without issuance of prior show-cause notice as per the statutory scheme. However, it is clarified that in light of the direction for issuance of fresh show-cause notice, and in light of enforcement of bank guarantee having been set aside, it is directed that if the adjudication after issuance of show-cause notice is not completed within a period of six months from the date of release of the order, the amount of Rs. 4 Lakhs is require .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates