9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 2055X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... LD THAT:- None of these contentions are having any merit. As per Secition 18(3)(C) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Labour Court award would be binding on the successor as well as assigns. Therefore, the new management cannot be heard to say that they were not bound by the awards passed in favour of the respondents. Likewise, the MoU entered into between the management and the present man ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .2008, directed that they have to be reinstated in service but without backwages. This award of the Labour Court was questioned by filing a writ petition. The awards had become final. But, the awards were not obeyed. There was no reinstatement. Therefore, the respondents in these writ petitions filed Claim Petitions Nos.17 and 18 of 2013 before the Labour Court, Madurai. The Labour Court by order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... successor as well as assigns. Therefore, the new management cannot be heard to say that they were not bound by the awards passed in favour of the respondents. Likewise, the MoU entered into between the management and the present management cannot have any effect on the rights of the workmen. 5. The new management that had taken over the establishment in question, ought to have taken cognizance ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
