TMI Blog2017 (4) TMI 1571X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere with this order. It is submitted that the petitioners have raised the issue of jurisdiction before the High Court of Gujarat viz. the petitioners are not the financial establishment. Since the notifications dated 12.03.2015 and 22.06.2015 issued by the Government of Maharashtra are challenged on this ground, it would be open to the petitioners to rais ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n filed by the petitioners on the principle of forum conveniens holding that the designated Judge in the High Court of Bombay under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishment) Act, 1999 would be more appropriate forum. We do not see any reason to interfere with this order. It is submitted that the petitioners have raised the issue of jurisdiction before the Hi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|