9911796707
TMI Blog1983 (11) TMI 16X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... come-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, has referred the following questions of law to this court for its opinion: " (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee could be said to have concealed the particulars of his income for the A. Y. 1973-74 so as to be penalised under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961 ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumst ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... explain the discrepancies in stocks. Penalty was accordingly levied by the ITO equal to the income concealed. On appeal, the AAC held that in respect of rice account, the assessee could not be held to have concealed particulars of his income and accordingly the amount of penalty was reduced to Rs. 5,000. On further appeal before the Tribunal, the order of the AAC was affirmed. Hence, at the insta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nal appreciated the material on record afresh in the penalty proceedings and found that it was proved that there was unexplained excess of wheat stock, as found by the Food Department. The Tribunal further found that in the absence of any plausible explanation by the assessee, it must be held, in view of its aforesaid finding in the penalty proceedings, that there was conscious concealment of inco ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
