Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (1) TMI 838

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... from A.Y.2015- 2016. Once we can hold that the word a employed can include plural residential houses also in Section 54 prior to its amendment such interpretations will not change merely because the purchase of new assets in the form of residential houses is at different addresses which would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. So long as the same Assessee (HUF) purchased one or more residential houses out of the sale consideration for which the capital gain tax liability is in question in its own name, the same Assessee should be held entitled to the benefit of deduction under Section 54 of the Act, subject to the purchase or construction being within the stipulated time limit in respect of the plural number of residential houses also. The said provision also envisages an investment in the prescribed securities which to some extent the present Assessee also made and even that was held entitled to deduction from Capital Gains tax liability by the authorities below. The Assessee-HUF in the present case, in our opinion, complied with the conditions of Section 54 of the Act in its true letter and spirit and, therefore was entitled to the deduction under Section 54 o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ,143/- in respect of two residential houses acquired. 2.4 That on the facts and circumstances and in law, the learned Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), 19, New Delhi erred in not allowing deduction u/s 54 of Income Tax Act, 1961 on the contention that appellant did not deposit unutilized amount in Capital Gain account scheme as per section 54(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 despite the fact that appellant had utilized amounts more than Long term Capital Gain earned by appellant before the filing of return of income. 2.4 Without prejudice, on the facts and circumstances and in law, the learned Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), 19, New Delhi erred in net allowing deduction u/s 54 of Income Tax Act, 1961 In respect of payments made within one year before sale of residential property for acquiring residential property. 3. That the appellant craves permission to add, amend, alter or vary all or any grounds of appeal on or before the date of hearing of appeal. 3. Representatives of both the sides were heard at length. Case records carefully perused. The judicial decisions relied upon by the Counsel duly considered. 4. During the cour .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for ₹ 6405100/-, the AO was of the opinion that the assessee is entitled for exemption only in respect of one residential house property accordingly concluded by holding that the claim of the assessee u/s. 54 against investment in two residential house property at two different places is hereby rejected and allowed to the extent of the purchase value of only one flat/ residential house having higher value of ₹ 6405100/- of Priyadarshani Vihar, Delhi property and made addition of ₹ 7462043/-. 11. Assessee carried the matter before the CIT(A) but without any success. 12. Before us the counsel for the assessee vehemently stated that this controversy of investment in two residential property situated at different location have been well settled by the Hon'ble High Court in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Strong reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Trilok Chand and Sons 105 taxman.com 151. 13. Per contra the DR strongly supported the findings of the AO. It is the say of the DR that the explanatory note to the provisions of the findings No.2 Act 2014 with regard to capital gain exemption in case of inves .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... two door nos are given viz., 623 and 729. but the complete addresses and even the name of the city is not clear in the facts narrated in the said Judgment. But in our considered opinion, the difference of location of the newly purchased residential house(s) will not alter the position for interpretation of the word 'a residential house' to the effect that it may include more than one or plural residential houses, as held by Karnataka High Court, with which we respectfully agree. The location of the newly purchased houses by the same assessee viz.. HUF out of sale consideration received on the sale of original capital Asset or a residential house in the given circumstances of availability of such residential houses as per the requirement of the HUF will not alter the position of interpretation. 21. In our understanding, if the word 'a' as employed under Section 54 prior to its amendment and substitution by the words 'one' with effect from 01.04.2015 could not include plural units of residential houses, there was no need to amend the said provisions by Finance Act No.2 of 2014 with effect from 01.04.2015 which the Legislature specifically made it clear to op .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nterest to refer to the Explanatory notes along with the Finance Bill by which the said amendment was incorporated in Section 54, which is quoted below for ready reference: "20.Capital gains exemption in case of investment in a residential house property 20.1. The provisions contained in sub-section (1) of Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, before its amendment by the Act, inter alia, provided that where capital gain arises from the transfer of long-term capital asset, being buildings or land appurtenant thereto, and being a residential house, and the assessee within a period of one year before or two years after the date of transfer, purchases, or within a period of three years after the date of transfer constructs, a residential house, then, the amount of capital gains to the extent invested in the new residential house is not chargeable to tax under section 45 of the Income- tax Act. 20.2. The provisions contained in sub-section(l) of section 54F of the Incometax Act, before its amendment by Act, inter-alia, provided that where capital gains arises from transfer of a long-term capital asset, not being a residential house, and the assessee within a period of one year be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates