9911796707
TMI BlogApplicability of circular 135/05/2020 for refund period prior to Oct-2019X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Applicability of circular 135/05/2020 for refund period prior to Oct-2019 X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e claimed the refund of few invoice not appearing GSTR-2A. After the application many supplier filed the GSTR-1 and many of the invoices are now appearing in GSTR 2A. Now department sent SCN asking to repay the refund on erroneous refund basis. When rule 36(4) it self is not applicable for the period under question for availament, can the circular 135/05/2020 insist the GSTR-2A requirement for the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... invoices to claim refund? Reply By Shilpi Jain: The Reply: Anytime until 01.01.2022, the rule 36(4) cannot be implemented. Also we need to check if this condition in section 16(2) is to be complied before taking credit or can be satisfied even after? The requirement for the department or the government is that the money should reach their kitty before anyone takes credit. So this should be a c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ondition allowed to be satisfied even post availing of credit. Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani: The Reply: Dept may go by GSTR-2A as it is the only method for them to verify if the credit or refund may be allowed. However, taxpayer need to justify that credit should be allowed as he satisfy conditions of sec.16. Reply By Amit Agrawal: The Reply: Circular No.135/05/2020 - GST dated 31.03.2020 was iss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ued by CBIC in exercise of its powers conferred by section 168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and thereby, these are binding instructions which Dept's officer has to follow. However, in Para 5 of said circular, it is clearly seen that CBIC has changed its policy (i.e. to grant refund only against ITC whose invoices are reflected in GSTR-2A) due to insertion of sub-rule (4 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ) to rule 36 of the CGST Rules, 2017 vide notification No. 49/2019-GST dated 09.10.2019. As querist has clarified that subject refund-claim was for Sept, 2019, one can argue that changes brought vide Circular No.135/05/2020 - GST dated 31.03.2020 cannot be applied to subject refund-claim. (However, Dept. may claim / argue that date of taking ITC is actual date of filing of GSTR-3B for Sept, 19 .. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ... another controversy under GST) But more importantly, Para 5 of said circular clearly overrides relevant legal provisions allowing refund of accumulated ITC. And thereby, it is fit case to challenge said instructions of Para 5 (& SCN so issued) by filing writ petition in jurisdictional high Court. It is ironical that in Para 2.2 of very same circular, CBIC notes that 'Hon'ble Delhi High C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ourt vide para 12 of the aforesaid Order has observed that the Circulars can supplant but not supplement the law. Circulars might mitigate rigours of law by granting administrative relief beyond relevant provisions of the statute, however, Central Government is not empowered to withdraw benefits or impose stricter conditions than postulated by the law' and then CBIC goes on given more instruct ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ions to its officers in Para 5 which are nothing but withdrawing benefits or imposing stricter conditions than postulated by the law'. From query, it seems that Dept. is seeking only recovery of refund already granted but not sought denial of ITC. Unless ITC itself is denied, refund thereto cannot be denied in given situation under discussion. And this fact will make 'grounds to be taken ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in suggested writ petition' more forceful.
Al above are strictly my personal views and same should not be taken as professional advice / suggestion.
Reply By NRSR CO:
The Reply:
Amith Sir, Your reply is more relavent. The same issue what you have expressed in your comment is the real worry for many assessee. Dept is insisting to follow Circular 135 which is beyond the law of land. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
