TMI Blog2017 (4) TMI 1576X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er 2014 (2) TMI 1260 - ITAT MUMBAI the questions as proposed do not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus, not entertained. - INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1710 OF 2014 - - - Dated:- 3-4-2017 - M.S. SANKLECHA AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. A. R. Malhotra For the Respondent : Ms. A. Vissanji with Mr. S. J. Mehta ORDER P.C: This Appeal under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the order the CIT(A) in directing the AO to delete the addition made to book profits u/s. 115JB an account of excess depreciation and subsidy received by way of excise duty? 3 Reg Question (a): (i) Mr. Malhotra, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that he has been instructed not t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|