9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (5) TMI 742X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Jain, Advs. For the Respondents : Govind Goel, B.S. Banthia and Ram Naresh Yadav, Advs. JUDGMENT Dalveer Bhandari, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Misc. Case Nos. 5070, 5071 and 5072 of 2005. 3. Appellant, Dr. Arvind Barsaul, and respondent No. 2, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... minal complaint at Mahila Thana, Padaw against the appellant husband, appellant Smt. Pushplata Barsaul (mother-in-law) and appellant Shri Chitranjan Singh Barsaul (father-in-law). 5. On 3.11.1996, a decree of divorce was granted by mutual consent of the parties. Respondent No. 2 filed Criminal Case No. 913 of 1995 against appellant husband and Rajendra Singh (appellant's sister's husb ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... differences and filed three separate petitions for recording the compromise in the criminal proceedings. The First Appellate Court rejected the compromise petition stating that the offence under Section 498A IPC is not liable of compromise. 8. The appellants being aggrieved from the said judgment of the First Appellate Court filed three separate petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he had undergone transplant of his kidney and the appellant's mother is suffering from multiple ailments and is virtually bed-ridden. 10. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties at length. The parties have compromised and the complainant Smt. Sadhna Madnawat categorically submitted that she does not want to prosecute the appellants. Even otherwise also, in the peculiar facts and ci ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
