2016 (8) TMI 1567

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... With ITA No. 1693 of 2011 With ITA No. 1769 of 2011 With ITA No. 1773 of 2011 - - - Dated:- 9-8-2016 - M.S. Sanklecha And A.K. Menon, JJ. For the Appellants : Ms. Samiksha Kanani i/b Mr. Suresh Kumar. For the Respondents : Ms. Khushbu Malviya i/b Desai Chinoy. ORDER P.C. 1. These Appeals arise from the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the 'Tr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed. 3. In the present cases, the tax effect as mentioned in paragraph 10 of the each of the Appeal Memos is as under :- Appeal No. Assessment Yea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X