2021 (12) TMI 1319

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ting Respondent Nos.1 to 10 states that SEBI was not only represented during the hearing of the matter but SEBI was also present during the settlement talks held on six occasions. Senior Advocate appearing for SEBI states on instructions, that save and except the fact that SEBI was represented before the Learned Single Judge at the time of hearing, SEBI disputes all the other statements/ submissio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndeparkar alongwith Mr. Rohan Mathur instructed by Anoma Law Group LLP, Mr. D.J. Khambatta, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Prerak Seksaria, Mr. Karan Rukhana, Mr. Subir Kumar, Ms. Disha Shah instructed by SDS Advocates, Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Yohaann Limathwalla instructed by J. Sagar Associates, Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Siddharth Ranade and Ms. Sa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... also has consent of all the parties. 2. The Advocates appearing for Respondent Nos.1 to 10, 11 and 12 have submitted that the Order dated 28th October, 2021, is passed by consent. In fact, Advocate Khandeparkar representing Respondent Nos.1 to 10 states that SEBI was not only represented during the hearing of the matter but SEBI was also present during the settlement talks held on six occasio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X