9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (4) TMI 203X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Nilotpal Shyam, Ms. Shivali and Mr. Saif Ali, Advocates. Respondent Through: Mr Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel. O R D E R [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] 1. This writ petition is directed against the order-in-original dated 02.02.2021, passed by the Commissioner of Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST), Audit-II, Delhi. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... submission that the e-mail appended on page 239 of the case file has been sent by, one, Mr. Nilotpal Shyam, Advocate, whom the respondent could not have recognised, unless vakalatnama had been placed on record by the petitioner. 3. Clearly, qua the query raised by us as to whether the respondent had the email-id of the petitioner i.e., the assessee, Mr. Kumar has not been able to give us any cle ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 814/-. The petitioner avers that an order-in-original in that behalf was passed on 19.06.2015. Against the said order, cross-appeals have been filed, which, according to the petitioner, are pending before Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). 5. Given this position, Mr. Kumar is directed to revert with instructions as to how respondent wishes to take the matter further. 6. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
