TMI Blog2022 (4) TMI 408X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gh : Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv. Respondents Through : Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Arunesh Sharma and Mr. Akshay Saxena, Advs. O R D E R [Physical Court hearing/ Hybrid hearing (as per request)] CM No.11361/2022 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No.15316/2022 2. The record shows that the principal grievance articulated by the petitioner is that the amount due to it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the stand taken was, that to the extent of the mismatch i.e. Rs. 23,344.20/-, an adjustment should be made, and accordingly, the balance amount ought to be released to it. It appears that despite this stand taken by the petitioner, the application for refund was rejected by the concerned Assistant Commissioner on 28.01.2021. Being aggrieved, an appeal was preferred, which was also dismissed by t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|