9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (4) TMI 1190X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hem Buildprop Private Limited and Petitioner never worked in the company i.e. M/s Aurochem BuildProp Private Limited and therefore the alleged finding that Petitioner had received huge amount from the investors of the said company, which is a group company of M/s Earth Infrastructure Limited, is frivolous fabricated - HELD THAT:- Having perused the paper book, this Court finds that the Master Da ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Shankar with Mr. Debashis Mukherjee, Advocates. Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, standing counsel for the Revenue . JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): 1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 30th March, 2022 passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of I ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... herein it is wrongfully alleged that the Petitioner had received a sum of ₹ 59,18,00,000/-from 636 investors in M/s Aurochem Buildprop Private Limited. He states that details of the said report were never provided to the Petitioner. He submits that the Petitioner had not been granted a fair hearing and the Respondents had proceeded with a pre determined mind. 4. Learned counsel for the Pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etition involves disputed questions of fact as well as allegations of fraud and forgery which cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction. In any event, the Petitioner has not been able to show to this Court that the Petitioner had, at any stage, asked for a report filed by the Resolution Professional before the NCLT. 7. Consequently, the present writ petition along with pending applications are d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
