2022 (7) TMI 836

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Nitin Gupta, Adv. And Ms. Filza Moonis, AOR For the Respondent(s) : None ORDER DINESH MAHESHWARI, J. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and having perused the material placed on record, we find no reason to entertain this appeal whereby the appellant, the corporate debtor, seeks to question the orders passed for restoration of a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l are sought to be questioned in this appeal before this Court. The grounds urged are essentially to the effect that only the application of condonation of delay was registered and the Tribunal had erred in allowing both the applications by its order dated 23.12.2021. It is also sought to be contended that the Tribunal could not have condoned the delay beyond 15 days. Both these grounds carry no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mits or curtails the powers of the Tribunal to condone the delay in filing the application for restoration. It needs hardly any reiteration that the rules or procedure are essentially intended to serve the cause of justice and are not for punishment of the parties in conduct of their matters. No further comments are required in that regard. The other ground being only the matter of form, and mile .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X