9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (7) TMI 1175X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssion made by learned Authorised Representative seems to be reasonable as the demand was confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority only on the ground that the appellant did not produce any documentary evidence in support of their submission. Therefore without going into the merits of the appeal, the matter is remanded to the Adjudicating Authority. But what is gathered from the impugned order is tha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o.60333 of 2021 - FINAL ORDER NO.60071/2022 - Dated:- 8-7-2022 - HON BLE MR. AJAY SHARMA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Ms. Archana Jain, Chartered Accountant for the Appellant Ms. Shivani, Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER: AJAY SHARMA This appeal has been filed limiting the challenge to the confirmation of the demand of Rs. 15,50,625/- in the Order-in-Origina ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at Credit on various grounds totalling Rs.8,26,31,564/-. Out of the aforesaid demand, the Adjudicating Authority vide impugned order dated 20.04.2021 confirmed the demand of Rs. 15,50,625/- only, with the observation that although the explanation given by the appellant appears to be convincing but neither during the audit nor during the Adjudication proceedings they produced documentary evidence i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as the demand was confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority only on the ground that the appellant did not produce any documentary evidence in support of their submission. Therefore without going into the merits of the appeal, I am inclined to remand the matter to the Adjudicating Authority. But what I gathered from the impugned order is that the documents filed by the appellant on 05.03.2015/13.05.2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
