9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (9) TMI 115X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... budgetary support and that no notice or opportunity of hearing was given before doing so - principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- The petitioner has been duly granted exemption/budgetary support till the beginning of the year 2020. Even, for the period January to March, 2020 part of the claim for budgetary support has been accepted meaning thereby that the petitioner is eligible for the gra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ated:- 10-3-2022 - HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE Petitioner: Sh. Bharat Raichandani, Advocate. Respondent: Sh. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. ORDER 01. Heard Sh. Bharat Raichandani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sh. Jagpaul Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. 02. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary discretionary ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... grant of budgetary support for the period January to March, 2020 for a sum of Rs.93,29,509/-. The respondents accepted the claim for the grant of Rs. 68,67,539/- but rejected the claim for budgetary support for the balance amount of Rs. 24,61,920/-. 05. The argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no reason has been assigned for rejecting the part of the claim for the budgetary s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the claim for budgetary support has been accepted meaning thereby that the petitioner is eligible for the grant of such benefits. 08. No reason has been assigned anywhere as to why the claim in respect of the balance amount has been rejected. 09. In addition to the above, the ineligibility of the petitioner to receive the budgetary support has been decided on the basis of the office memorand ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ated 26.08.2020 is unsustainable in law and that the respondents fell clearly in error in declining the budgetary support for part of the amount for the period January to March, 2020. 13. It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated about the eligibility of the petitioner for the benefits of budgetary support and the period for which the same is available to the petitioner. 14. The wr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
