9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (9) TMI 411X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion. 2. The CIT(A) has erred in law and facts in confirming penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of Rs.65,869/- in respect of addition made on without proper verification and settled law. The penalty needs deletion. 3. The CIT(A) has erred in law and facts in confirming penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of Rs.65,869/- without properly considering that Ld.A.O. has erred in not giving adequate time and opportunity although the assessee specifically requested for the same. The penalty needs deletion. 4. The CIT(A) has erred in not brining any cogent material justifying levy of penalty. The penalty needs deletion. 5. The CIT(A) has erred in not giving proper and adequate opportunity. The penalty order being bad in law needs cancellation. 6. The penalty order be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... be submitted that the Ld. A.O. has made addition of profit elements on estimate basis therefore penalty cannot be levied assessee also placed reliance on decision given by Hon. High Court Of Punjab & Haryana 258 ITR 85 it was held that provision of Sec.271(1)(c) are not attracted to cases where income of an assessee is assessed on estimate basis arid addition are made therein on that basis thus penalty levied may kindly be deleted. 1.4 It is also submitted that the amount retain at 10% is also purely on estimated basis and no solid proof / evidence for determining income as mentioned above are established. 1.5 Over and above amount of addition of Rs. 4,52,127/- is totally on presumption and estimated basis. It is settled law no penalty ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... follow that the notice issued proposing penalty were illusory and the assessee was incapacitated to defend its case. 3.2 At Para 2 page no. 2 of the penalty order the Ld. A.O. has mentions that simultaneously penalty proceedings U/s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 were initialed for furnishing inaccurate particulars and concealment of income. 3.3 Whereas the notice is issued dated 10/01/2014, 15/07/2014 and 22/07/2014 (Copy enclosed) through which, the penalty proceedings are initiated and completed describes as under. That you have concealed the particulars of your income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. 3.4 From the above its clear that the notice issued by the Ld. AO is not specifying proper charges and thus it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. Thus, the Revenue is not specifying any limb and simply imposed penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act without staking any default on the part of the assessee at the time of assessment proceedings related to information of income of the assessee. In the original assessment order, the addition was made in respect of peak credit balance and addition of bank interest. From the perusal of the records, it can be seen that the assessee has requested the Assessing Officer to treat the incurred cash deposit as his total sales receipts of trading activities of chalk lumps and offered profit at 8% of 9% of total turnover. Once the assessee has offered the same cash deposits, the Assessing Officer cannot obs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
