Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (9) TMI 899

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... MAR AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA APPELLANT (BY SRI M S NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE) RESPONDENT (BY SRI JEEVAN J NEERALGI, STANDING COUNSEL) JUDGMENT P.S. DINESH KUMAR J, This appeal by the assessee has been admitted to consider following question of law: "Whether the Tribunal was required to consider the initial date of submission of the subject refund claim on 31.03.2008 as the relevant da .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 19.08.2011 on the ground that the claim was beyond the period of limitation. On appeal, the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) vide order dated 19.11.2012 allowed appeal No.379/2012 and remitted the matter to the adjudicating Authority to re-consider the refund claim. 3. The Revenue challenged the said order before the CESTAT, Bengaluru. By its order dated 13.04.2018, the CESTAT, Bengaluru .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 07. In that case, the application was filed on 31.03.2009. This Court has held that the appellant was entitled for refund of CENVAT Credit in respect of the last quarter. 6. The submission of Shri Jeevan J Neeralgi is not disputed by the learned Advocate for the appellant. 7. In appellant's own case Suretex Prophylactics India (P) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Servi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on 17.12.2009, it is admitted in para 4(a) of statement of facts filed by the Revenue before CESTAT that the refund application was initially filed with the Service Tax Department on 31.03.2008 who had informed that the claimant should approach the Customs Range Officer and accordingly, the refund application was filed before the Customs Authority. That was also not accepted on the ground that th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the last quarter is concerned. The question of law upon which the appeal is admitted does not require any answer. Hence, the following: ORDER i. The appeal is allowed is part. ii. The original authority, namely, the Assistant Commissioner shall process the appellant's application for refund for the period from 01.01.2007 to 31.03.2007, in accordance with law, in terms of Section 11-B and 11 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates