2011 (12) TMI 775

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pecial Standing Counsel ORDER Madan B. Lokur, C.J. 1. Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions is the same and the facts are similar, they are being disposed of by this common order. The grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is that neither the assessing authority nor the appellate authority nor the revising authority under the Andhra Pradesh Genera .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and the value is arrived at Rs. 25,50,001.00 by adopting the average rate of Rs. 563.19. 3. Similarly, in the revisional order, it is noted that the contention of the petitioner was that the Commercial Tax Officer has passed the assessment order blindly following the report of the Vigilance and Enforcement Officer without conducting an enquiry. It is also noted that in the grounds of appeal a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ce and Enforcement Department was not supplied to the petitioners and yet it was used against them. 6. Learned Special Counsel for the Commercial Taxes Department says that the petitioners will be supplied with the report of the Vigilance and Enforcement Department within one week and the matter will be considered afresh by the assessing authority. 7. In view of this submission and statement .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X