2018 (11) TMI 1922

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... while working out the deduction admissible u/s 10A - HELD THAT:- The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the first substantial question of law that arises for consideration in the instant appeal is covered by the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-III VS. HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD., [ 2018 (5) TMI 357 - SUPREME COURT] TPA - comparable se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... RAL-III VS. HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD., (2018) 93 TAXMANN.COM 33 (SC) and second and third substantial questions of law is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU VS. SOFTBRANDS INDIA (P) LTD., (2018) 94 TAXMANN.COM 426 (KARNATAKA). Hence, he pleads that the present appeal be dismissed. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the appell .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X