9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 1231X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and 27.3.2012 - HELD THAT:- This court is not inclined to accept such contention raised on the side of the petitioner/accused - Here is the case, wherein the private complaint was filed on 30.7.2012 stating that the amount of Rs.7,00,000/- was paid by way of cash to the accused and the cheque bearing No.114866 dated 5.6.2012 drawn on ICICI bank issued by the accused for the same, assuring that t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to by this court in this quash petition, which is summary in nature. This court feels that it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioner herein - petition disposed off. - Crl.O.P.No.3509 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 1-8-2014 - THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI For the Petitioner : Mr.R.Krishnamurthy For the Respondent : Mr.I.Ab ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mplaint. 4. In support of such contention, the copy of FIR is produced before this court and the reading of the same would reveal that the complaint received was registered as FIR in Cr.No.1785 of 2013 on 19.12.2013. The allegation raised in the complaint filed against the wife of the defacto complainant and the defacto complainant is that 5 cheques were stolen and the occurrence of the offence ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ht it fit to give complaint during 2011 itself. Though the date of occurrence was between 2011 and March 2012, the complaint was given on 19.12.2013 much after the issuance of statutory notice. That being so, this court is not inclined to accept the theory as put forth before this court, to quash the proceedings. In my considered view, the same is available by way of defence to the accused to be a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
