9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (11) TMI 2009X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... act service, the Tribunal in M/S S S TECHNOCRAFTS PVT. LTD., M/S. AHLUWALIA CONSTRUCTION GROUP VERSUS CST, DELHI [ 2016 (7) TMI 1663 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] has remanded the matter to the original authority for deciding the issues afresh in line with the decision of Tribunal in the case of M/S BHAYANA BUILDERS (P) LTD. OTHERS VERSUS CST, DELHI OTHERS. [ 2013 (9) TMI 294 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)] ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 17-53119/2014-Ex [DB] - Final Order No. 58392-58394/2017 - Dated:- 2-11-2017 - Hon'ble Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial) And Hon ble Mr. B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical) For the Appellant : Mr. S.K. Sarwal, (Advocate). For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Jain, AR. ORDER Per S.K. Mohanty : These appeals are directed against the impugned order dated 24.01.2014 pa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d have been classified under the works contract service by the authorities below. He also submitted that the various other submissions made by the appellant before the lower authorities were not considered and the adjudged demand were confirmed solely, on the ground that the appellant is not eligible for the abatement and also for the ongoing projects, the classification cannot be changed to the w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records. 5. We find that for ascertaining the fact of entitlement to the abatement benefit and consideration of the activities under the works contract service, the Tribunal vide final order dated 14.07.2016 has remanded the matter to the original authority for deciding the issues afresh in line with the decision of Tribunal in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
