2008 (4) TMI 216

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n dismissed by this Court in connected matters - In the light of the above fact, no substantial question of law survives for our consideration in this appeal - 51 of 2008 - - - Dated:- 11-4-2008 - SATISH KUMAR MITTAL and RAKESH KUMAR GARG JJ. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant-revenue. JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. - 1. The reven .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X