Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (8) TMI 1852

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ely a commercial one and no element of public interest is involved. There is no obligation on the part of respondent No.1 to extend the period of license from time to time, as per the terms agreed in between them. Since the license of the appellant-writ petitioner expired long back on 22.03.2019 and a notice dated 27.06.2019 was issued by the respondent No.1 to the appellant-writ petitioner to vacate the premises by 30.06.2019, there is no prima facie case and balance of convenience in favour of the appellant-writ petitioner and no irreparable loss would be caused to the appellant-writ petitioner. Appeal dismissed. - WRIT APPEAL No.677 of 2019 - - - Dated:- 16-8-2019 - THE HON BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND THE HO .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is discriminating the appellant-writ petitioner. The appellant-writ petitioner requires only 1,033 sq. fee of land for its operations and the respondent No.1 is treating the appellant-writ petitioner in a different manner to that of other service providers. The respondent No.1 vide proceedings No.GHAL/GH19/GH/010, dated 27.06.2019, directed the appellant-writ petitioner to vacate the premises by 30.06.2019. If the appellant-writ petitioner is evicted, the public at large will suffer, as such, the public interest is involved. The appellant-writ petitioner in the impugned writ petition filed two applications, one seeking a direction to respondent No.1 to allow to carry on its trade, business, profession at the current premises admeasuring 96 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed for in the writ petition. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the period of licence granted in favour of the appellant-writ petitioner came to an end on 22.03.2019. Notice to vacate 96.04 sq. meters of area by 30.06.2019 was issued by respondent No.1. The appellant-writ petitioner has no right for continuing in the said licensed premises. The learned Single Judge had given elaborate reasons and dismissed the interlocutory applications. Learned counsel for the respondents ultimately prayed to dismiss the writ appeal. 6. In view of submissions made by both sides, the point that arises for determination is: 1. Whether the learned Single Judge is justified in dismissing I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2019 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates