9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (9) TMI 1647X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Baleshwar Chaturvedi,Krishna Agarwala ORDER 1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 3 and Sri Krishna Agrawal, Advocate for respondents no. 4 and 5. 2. The dispute relates to recovery of electricity dues outstanding against M/s Aishwarya Ispat Pvt. Ltd.-Respondent-6. 3. It is not in dispute that recovery certificate was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titioner. Secondly, it is submitted that even otherwise petitioner is not a Director of Company and, therefore, also dues of Respondent-6 cannot be realized from personal assets of petitioner. 5. In our view question no. 1 itself having already concluded by various judgments of this Court, hence we need not go into second question which involves investigation into facts. 6. It is not the case of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Collector, 1989 UPTC 456; M/s Meekin Transmission Ltd. Kanpur Nagar and another Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2008(4) ADJ 360(DB); Smt. Uma Singhania Vs. Assistant Collector, Trade Tax, Kanpur and another, 2009(20) VST 252 (All); Rajendra Kumar Agarwal and others Vs. Trade Tax Officer and another, (2011) 40 VST 417(All); Piyush Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2012(6) ADJ 253; Stephen Verghes V ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
