2014 (2) TMI 1416

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tral Excise Rules, 1944, prior to 21-10-1994 - HELD THAT:- The question has been answered against the Revenue in COMMISSIONER VERSUS THURAN SPINNING MILLS [ 2013 (12) TMI 1608 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] , following the decision of this Court in the case of COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., SALEM VERSUS SINGARAVELAR SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD. [ 2009 (2) TMI 195 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS] . The question is answered a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oods under erstwhile Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944, prior to 21-10-1994 or not? 2. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the assessee/Revenue fairly submitted that the question has been answered against the Revenue in C.M.A. No. 350 of 2006, dated 6-12-2013, [Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/s. Thuran Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd.], following the decision of this Court in the case o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X