9911796707
TMI Blog2004 (9) TMI 707X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /2002. Against the Order dated 31/5/2002 a Special Leave Petition had already been filed. That stood dismissed. After the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, an application for review of Order dated 31/5/2002 was filed before the High Court. The High Court has thus dismissed the Review Petition. Now, not only the order on the Review Petition but the Order dated 31/5/2002, against which a Special ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ny authority or court, such authority/court shall consider the matter afresh such claims with particular reference to the rights, if any, flowing from such bye-laws uninfluenced by any of the observations made in the judgment under challenge. We express no opinion, either way on all or any of such claims. With liberties left as above, the special leave petitions shall stand dismissed. "Reli ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he settled position, the above mentioned Orders cannot be considered to be precedents. 2. As the Special Leave Petitions are not maintainable, leave to file a Special Leave Petition is refused. 3. S.L. Ps. will stand dismissed. Held: In future if a Special Leave Petition is filed against the Order dated 31/5/2002 in LPA No. 271/97 and LPA No. 278/97 or Order dated 18/12/2003 in RA No. 1578/2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
