2009 (2) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... le in the hands of the appellant despite the fact the appellant was not owning any property – held that ITAT correctly applied the law
VIKRAMAJIT SEN and RAJIV SHAKDHER JJ. Ashwini Taneja with Ms. Poonam Ahuja and Ms. Mahima Aggarwal, Advs. for the Appellant. Mr. R.D. Jolly, Advocate for the respondent. ORDER 1. Heard. 2. Admit. 3. The following substantial questions of law are framed: ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pellant's cash book as genuine? 4. In so far as proposed Question No.1 is concerned, we are of the opinion that no question of law arises for our consideration for the reasons given hereinafter: 5. The question of law as proposed is as follows:- (1) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in sustaining addition to the extent of Rs.36,918/- out of the total addition made o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X