9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (4) TMI 1174X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... which contains an electronic dialogue on the Income Tax Portal between the Income Tax department and Petitioner with respect to the purported inconsistency with respect to the sum of Rs.42,94,12,920/- which the petitioner has disagreed with the following remarks : The proposed adjustment is incorrect. The proposed amount of Rs.42,94,12,920/- is already disclosed in Form 3CD clause 21(g) and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tes, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate ORDER P.C. : 1 This petition had been filed seeking the following main relief: That this Hon ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari/mandamus, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, calling for all the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d in the order dated 22nd November 2022 under Section 154 of the I.T.Act. Learned counsel draws the attention of this Court to page 34 of the petition with reference to adjustments made under Section 143(1)(a) of the I.T.Act, and particularly to Serial No.7, to submit that although this amount has been admittedly mentioned in Form 3CD but under the head Amount in Income Tax Returns , the figure o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ith respect to the purported inconsistency with respect to the sum of Rs.42,94,12,920/- which the petitioner has disagreed with the following remarks : The proposed adjustment is incorrect. The proposed amount of Rs.42,94,12,920/- is already disclosed in Form 3CD clause 21(g) and also disallowed in the ITR computation refer Schedule BP Sr no 23. 4 It is also observed from the rectificat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
