TMI Blog2022 (8) TMI 1380X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the cases of DATARAM SINGH VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. [ 2018 (2) TMI 410 - SUPREME COURT] SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ANR. [ 2021 (10) TMI 1296 - SUPREME COURT] and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ) U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Dadri, DistrictGautam Budh Nagar, during pendency of trial. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart the applicant is said to have been involved in one criminal case in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. Apart from one case, the applicant has cr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 & Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned wit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ecure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|