TMI Blog2013 (3) TMI 872X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... directed to take notice for the respondents. 2. In this case, the petitioner has sought for an order directing the respondents not to insist upon it to obtain license to carry on lawful activities in its premises either under the Police Act, or under the Provisions of Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusement Order and not to interfere in the play of skill oriented games like Rummy ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sel for the petitioner has relied on an earlier decision of this Court rendered in WP No.11843 of 2006, decided on 9.11.2006 (between M/s.Shiva Association vs. State of Karnataka & others) and submits that on similar terms this petition may also be disposed of. 4. Learned HCGP appearing for the respondents submits that the Police have not interfered and will not interfere with the lawful activiti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on according to law in case the petitioner indulges in any unlawful activity. On identical facts, this Court in Shiva's case (supra) has restrained the respondents from interfering with the lawful activities of the petitioner. 6. In the light of the above discussion, I pass the following order:- a) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|