9911796707
TMI Blog1997 (10) TMI 418X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... osh N. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Sunil Kumar Jain, Vijay Hansaria, Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Vikas Pahwa, Advs. for Jain Hansari and Company, Adv. For the Respondents : Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv., Ashok Bhan, Bina Gupta, Rakhi Ray, Mahesh Jethmalani, R.N. Karanjawala, Upamanyu Hazarika, Nandini Gore, ( Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, ) Advs. for M. Karanjawala, Adv. JUDGMENT K.T. THOMAS, J. 1. Lea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g directed the Appellants to release the Respondents, if arrested, on bail of Rs. 10,000/- each with one or two sureties of the like amount. 3. Various arguments have been raised by Shri K.T.S. Tulsi, Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants, in challenge of the impugned orders. Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents, while arguing in reply to the Appellants' contention did not d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fences in question must for all practical purposes be considered by the High Court of Guwahati within whose territorial jurisdiction such activities should have been perpetrated. In view of the conceded position that Appellants were not heard by the High Court we set aside the impugned orders on that ground alone. The applications are to be disposed of after hearing the Appellants also. For that p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rtained by any Court other than the Division Bench of the High Court of Guwahati indicated above. 7. Status quo as on today will be maintained by the Appellants vis-a-vis the Respondents herein till 7-11-1997 which is necessary to enable the Division Bench of the High Court of Guwahati to pass appropriate orders on the applications filed by the Respondents. 8. We direct the Registry to take ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
