2021 (12) TMI 1448

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed that Counsel for Applicant made statement with regard to his family members being suffering from COVID-19. HELD THAT:- There are no inconsistency with the Statement made in para 5 of the Application filed by the Applicant and statement of the counsel for the Applicant which was recorded in the impugned order. The Adjudicating Authority condoned the delay in filing the application and res .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... main petition has been restored. 2. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that there was no good ground to condone the delay. He submits that the application for condonation of delay and restoration ought to have been decided separately. 3. We are of the view that the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority is perfectly in accordance with law and substantive justice has been .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t for the applicant to mange to file the present restoration application in the 30 days statutory time limit. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that in the impugned order it has been noted that Counsel for Applicant made statement with regard to his family members being suffering from COVID-19. We do not find any inconsistency with the Statement made in para 5 of the Application filed by t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X