TMI Blog2020 (9) TMI 1294X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g for the appellant with the new set of counsel, submits that she be heard as the counsel who have thus far appeared for the appellant have no authority to appear. The Apex Council s resolution is in the face of the Supreme Court s aforesaid order and, ex facie, is an interference in these proceedings. The court would not pass any orders, apropos the same, at this stage. The only focus now is t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... yant Mohan Ms Meenakshi Chatterjee, Advocates for R-3. Mr Jayant Mehta and Mr Nishant Rao, Advocate for R-6. Mr Khowaja Siddiqui, Mr Ashwini Kumar and Mr Arup Sinha, Advocates for R-8. Mr Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC for R14/UOI. ORDER The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. 1. On 07.09.2020, the Supreme Court had passed the following order:- On 04. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urt, at least thrice, are now sought to be removed by a resolution passed in an emergent of the DDCA s Apex Council, held on 13.09.2020. 3. The appellant has been heard on previous dates. The respondents have long concluded their arguments. Indeed, the appellant is in the process of concluding its rejoinder arguments. The learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant with the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|