TMI Blog2023 (8) TMI 412X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... HELD THAT:- The counsel would contend that the proceedings initiated against the present petitioners was not maintainable and should have been interdicted by the High Court in the impugned judgment. Issue notice. - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY And HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL For the Petitioner : Mr. Gopal Shankarnarayan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Apoorv Agit78arwal, Adv. Mr. Ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... equential facts, the senior counsel would submit that the cheque in question was presented on 18.11.2019 and after the IRP was appointed on 10.10.2019 and moratorium had commenced under the IBC, the dishonouring of the company s cheque subsequently on 19.11.2019, could not have been the basis for initiating proceedings against the former Director of the Company, who can have nothing to do with the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|