Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (8) TMI 577

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the appeal through the impugned Order dated 03.06.2023 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Act and consequently, to set aside the same and pass such other orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2. Heard Sri Vemireddy Bhaskar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax. 3. This matter is disposed of at the stage of admission as requested by Counsels on record. Petitioner's case in nutshell :- 4. Petitioner is a registered dealer on the rolls of the Assistant Commissioner (ST) Chittor-I under the provisions of both CGST and SGST Act, 2017 and is engaged in the business of purchase and sale of iron scrap. On 21.01.2023, the Assistant Com .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd passed the impugned Order, which is not tenable under law. Though it is the discretion of the appellate authority to condone the delay, discretion has to be exercised judiciously. The petitioner's bank accounts were frozen, notices issued to the dealers to whom he has supplied the goods and yet to receive the consideration. Learned Appellate Authority ought to have considered the reason for the delay since he was prevented by sufficient cause and entertained the appeal. 6. Per contra, learned Government Pleader would submit that the impugned Order is a reasoned Order. Learned authority opined that the reason for the delay is not convincing. The petitioner, without giving any details of the financial crisis his business faced, simply men .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... order and may, by order, direct any officer subordinate to him to apply to the Appellate Authority within six months from the date of communication of the said decision or order for the determination of such points arising out of the said decision or order as may be specified by the Commissioner in his order. (3) Where, in pursuance of an order under sub-section (2), the authorized officer makes an application to the Appellate Authority, such application shall be dealt with by the Appellate Authority as if it were an appeal made against the decision or order of the adjudicating authority and such authorised officer were an appellant and the provisions of this Act relating to appeals shall apply to such application. (4) The Appellate Au .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tor, Land Acquisition Vs. Mst. Katiji AIR 1987 SC 1353 While deciding application under Section 5 Limitation Act, "justice oriented approach" is required to be adopted. The expression 'sufficient cause' is adequately elastic to enable the courts to apply the law in a meaningful manner which subserve the ends of justice that being the life-purpose for the existence of the institution of Courts. 10. Hon'ble Apex Court laid down the following principle to be followed while dealing with an application seeking condonation of delay:- 1. Ordinarily a litigant does not stand to benefit by lodging an appeal late. 2. Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and has impliedly excluded the application of the Limitation Act. It is trite, that the Limitation Act will apply only if it is extended to the special statute. It is also rudimentary that the provisions of a fiscal statute have to be strictly construed and interpreted". 13. While considering the application for condonation of delay, it is not the length of the delay, but cause for delay which would be paramount consideration. If the cause shown as indicated under Section 107(4) of the act, such delay deserves to be condoned irrespective of the length of the delay. It does not mean that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) can condone the delay beyond the condonable period that is one month after expiry of three months after statutory period .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner. 17. In this context it is necessary to refer Section 107 (6) which is vivid on the point of deposit of 10% of the disputed tax which is mandatory at the time of filing of the appeal. When the bank account of the petitioner is freezed by the authorities, it is a relevant fact to consider the delay since the pre-deposit of 10% disputed tax at the time of filing of the appeal is mandatory. The view taken by the learned Commissioner appears to be forcing the horse to run after tying the legs. The right of appeal which is created under statute is a substantive right of the party that cannot be denied by taking pedantic view. We are not convinced with the reasons assigned by the learned Commissioner in rejecting the appeal. Since, it is wit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates