9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (8) TMI 1000X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his appeal is directed against the Order-In-Appeal No OIA-MUN-CUSTM-000-APP-044-14-15 dated 17/03/2015 whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) held the order-in-original and rejected the appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant had filed Bill of Entry No. 6289437 dated 31.07.2014 through their CHA for clearance of 51716.00Kgs of Hot Rolled Steel Plates having assessable value at 3 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dered themselves liable to penalty under the provision of Section 112 (a) of the customs act, 1962. Accordingly, the adjudicating authority confiscated the goods of 2104 Kgs of Hot Rolled Steel Plates and imposed redemption fine of Rs. 30,000/- under section 125 and also penalty of Rs. 15,000/- under Section 112 (a) of customs Act, 1962. Being aggrieved by the order in original, the appellant file ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bmits that the appellant made the payment of the total invoice value in spite of the increase in the actual weight of goods. He submits that the appellant had paid the differential custom duty but since there is no mala fide the penalty and redemption fine should not be imposed. 3. Shri G.Kirupanandan, Learned Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the finding o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... id the invoice value on the basis of the weight declared in the invoice irrespective that the actual weight is slightly more than the declared weight. The appellant have also discharged the custom duty on the differential weight of the goods. In this fact, I do not find any mis-declaration on the part of the appellant as there is no dispute that the weight in the invoice was mentioned as per the t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
