9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (8) TMI 1000X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the weight is calculated as per the size of plate on the theoretical basis, there has to be difference in the weight calculated and shown in the invoice and the actual weight. It is also fact that the appellant had paid the invoice value on the basis of the weight declared in the invoice irrespective that the actual weight is slightly more than the declared weight. The appellant have also discharged the custom duty on the differential weight of the goods. In this fact, there are no mis-declaration on the part of the appellant as there is no dispute that the weight in the invoice was mentioned as per the theoretical weight basis by taking a standard weight for particular size of the plate. Therefore, it cannot be said that the appellant have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the provision of Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962 and rendered themselves liable to penalty under the provision of Section 112 (a) of the customs act, 1962. Accordingly, the adjudicating authority confiscated the goods of 2104 Kgs of Hot Rolled Steel Plates and imposed redemption fine of Rs. 30,000/- under section 125 and also penalty of Rs. 15,000/- under Section 112 (a) of customs Act, 1962. Being aggrieved by the order in original, the appellant filed an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) who rejected the appeal, therefore the present appeal. 2. Shri S.J Vyas, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that this is not a case where the appellant have mis-declared the weight intentionally to evade the paymen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at when the weight is calculated as per the size of plate on the theoretical basis, there has to be difference in the weight calculated and shown in the invoice and the actual weight. It is also fact that the appellant had paid the invoice value on the basis of the weight declared in the invoice irrespective that the actual weight is slightly more than the declared weight. The appellant have also discharged the custom duty on the differential weight of the goods. In this fact, I do not find any mis-declaration on the part of the appellant as there is no dispute that the weight in the invoice was mentioned as per the theoretical weight basis by taking a standard weight for particular size of the plate. Therefore, it cannot be said that the a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
