2023 (9) TMI 439

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng the reply - seeking sufficient opportunity for personal hearing to the petitioner - HELD THAT:- On perusing the impugned order, it is seen that the respondent has recorded that the dealer did not file any reply so far. The said fact is incorrect. The petitioner has submitted a reply on 24.07.2023. However, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitione .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te sufferer is the Government. The respondents are directed to grant one more personal hearing to the petitioner and the petitioner shall cooperate with the enquiry. Thereafter, the respondent shall pass a speaking order - the impugned order ought to be quashed - Petition allowed. - THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SRIMATHY For the Petitioners : Mr.A.Satheesh Murugan For the Respondent : Mr.M.Rame .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s submitted a reply on 24.07.2023. However, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner was granted three personal hearings and the petitioner did not appear and has not submitted any reply on the said three days. Even though the petitioner has not appeared for the said three personal hearings, subsequently, he has filed a reply on 24.07.2023, before .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X