Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (9) TMI 1037

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the assessee as long term capital gains without proper application of mind and Ld.CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in confirming the said addition in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. That the Ld. AO erred in law and on facts in passing an invalid, arbitrary and unreasonable assessment order making an addition of Rs 28892596/- to the income of the assessee and Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in upholding the assessment made by Ld. AO in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. That the Ld. AO erred in law and on facts in making and Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition of Rs. 28892596/- as LTCG by adopting miniscule market value as on 01.04.1981 of land sold by the appellant in the facts and circumstances of the case. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 8. The appellant craves leave to amend or alter all or any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal and amend, alter or add any other ground of appeal." 3. None appeared for the assessee. The Power of Attorney has been filed on behalf of the assessee but even the representative of the assessee has not appeared though the assessee has been served with notice issued by the Registry, therefore, we are constrained to hear the Ld. Departmental Representative, verify the materials available on record and decide the matter. 4. Brief facts of the case as per the assessment order are as under:- "As per the documents submitted, it was noticed. that vide sale deed bearing Certificate No. IN-DL93631704997977L dated 2.12.2013, the assessee, Smt. Geeta a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n w.r.t. the cost of acquisition/cost price to her of the land at Village Daulatpur, New Delhi. As per the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Premwati v. Union of India & Ors. in Civil Appeal No. 949 of 2005 and in the case of Rajinder Singh (D) by Lrs. v. Delhi College of Engineering in Civil Appeal No. 2443 of 2005, the value of land in the Village Shahibababd, Daulatpur was fixed at Rs. 50,000/- per bigha. Thus, the fair market value of the land in question is taken as Rs. 50,000/- per bigha for computation of Long Term Capital Gain in the hands of assessee by the undersigned. In view of above discussion, the long term capital gain in the hands of assessee is computed as under :- The assessee has not furnished any .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 05 and in the case of Rajinder Singh (D) by Lrs. v. Delhi College of Engineering in Civil Appeal No. 2443 of 2005. The appellant has contended that the value of the land sold by her could not be compared with the value adopted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case referred above and in this regard had contended that the land sold by her was better located and was not agriculture land. It was in this background that vide letter dated 17.10.2018 the appellant was asked to furnish the details so as to verify the genuineness of the contentions of the appellant. As pointed out above inspite of repeated opportunities no satisfactory reply was furnished by the appellant. The appellant merely contended that the land sold by the appellant was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ,30,208/- during the year under consideration. The capital gains arising from the said transaction were undisputedly taxable, the A.O. has taken fair market value as on 01/04/1981 at Rs. 50,000/- per bigha based on the Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Premawati Vs. Union of India and Ors. in Civil Appeal No. 949/2005 and also in the case of Rajender Singh (D) by LRs Vs. Delhi College of Engineering in Civil Appeal No. 2443/2005. 8. It was the case of the assessee that the land sold by her could not be compared with the value adopted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case referred above and contended that her land was better located and was not an agriculture land. The assessee except making the above .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates