2023 (2) TMI 1191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e appellants having cooperated but not having appeared before the Court personally but through a counsel - HELD THAT:- It is noted that even the mandate subsequently incorporated in SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ANR. [ 2021 (10) TMI 1296 - SUPREME COURT] has been violated - it cannot be understood why despite these judgments having been circulated, some of the tri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Ms. Vindhya Mehra, Adv., Mr. Parikshit Ahuja, Adv., Ms. Praveena Bisht, Adv., Ms. Madhur Jhavar, Adv., Mr. Kartik Lahoti, Adv., Ms. Garima Verma, Adv., Mr. Rahul Maheshwari, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela, Adv., Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR, Mr. Ankit Mishra, Adv., Ms. Ayushi Mittal, Adv. ORDER Leave granted. The issue before us is whether on the charge s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has been violated. We fail to understand why despite these judgments having been circulated, some of the trial Courts are conducting and passing the orders in the teeth of these judgments. It is a matter of concern that these cases thus, keep on coming up to the apex Court unnecessarily. We are not also be able to appreciate the impugned order dated 24.01.2022 passed by the High Court calling .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X