Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (11) TMI 1893

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of software expenses claimed as revenue expenditure aggregating to Rs. 11,47,520/- which has been treated as capital in nature. (ii) Disallowance of Rs. 84,50,557/- on account of provision of expenditure to be reimbursed to the parent/group company in connection with software allocation cost on the ground that deduction of tax at source u/s 195 r.w.s. 194J has not been made and consequently, 40(a)(i) has been made. (iii) Disallowance of Rs. 5,07,500/- on account of replacement of old monitors of Rs.5,07,520/- and Artificial Carpet Charges of Rs. 1,13,453/- on the ground that the same is not covered by the definition of 'current repairs'. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, assessee is in the business of media planning, executi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3D Research Cost 1,49,199 6 Research Software Cost (Radio Monitoring Software) 30,928   Total (Rs.) 11,47,520 3. The Ld. CIT(A), too upheld the action of the AO on the ground that it has an enduring benefit. 4. Before us, the Ld. Counsel submitted that this issue had come up for consideration before the Tribunal in assessee's own case for the assessment year 2006-07. 5. After hearing the parties and on perusal of the impugned order, we find that these software license costs which has been paid by the assessee is for using of software for its day-to-day business requirements, as stated by the assessee before the AO. These softwares keep are ever changing from time to time and did not have a useful life for very long period an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fore, disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) has been made. The Ld. CIT(A) too has confirmed the said addition on the following reasons :- "The amount paid towards purchase of Software is Royalty as held in the case of CIT (Int.Tax) vs Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd 320 ITR 209 (Mum). The appellant has produced the bills of Mindshare Asia Pacific have not been produced to prove that what Mindshare Asia Pacific have not been produced to prove that what Mindshare Asia Pacific has changed is merely the reimbursement of actual software cost. Without prejudice the amount has been paid towards purchase of software either directly or through intermediary does not matter. Hence provisions of sec. 194J were clearly applicable". 7. Before us, the Ld. Couns .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to in sub-clauses (i) to (vi); Thus, there is no requirement of deducting TDS either u/s 195 or u/s 194J. The Ld. Counsel further referred to the details of software cost allocated on cost sharing basis and also the nature of such software as given in the paper book and submitted that these softwares were procured centrally for all the group entities for better and coordinated functioning. She also drew our attention to the details of software expenses allocated by Parent Company along with the internal debit invoices. Thus, she submitted that, it cannot be treated as "royalty". 8. On the other hand, Ld. DR strongly relied upon the order of the AO as well as CIT(A) and submitted that, the software has been supplied by the Parent Company .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... up entities on the proportionate basis. Such an allocation has not been disputed except for holding that the reimbursement of cost paid by the assessee to the Parent/ AE Company amounts to "Royalty". Such a reimbursement of cost cannot be held to be for any transfer of any right or giving any right to use within the ambit and scope of any of the definition as given in Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi). Once such a payment does not fall within any of the parameters set out in Explanation 2, then it cannot be held that, it is in the nature of "royalty". 'Mindshare Asia Pacific' is procuring the software from somewhere else and loading the cost on proportionate basis to various group entities without any mark-up hence on reimbursement of such .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates