9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (10) TMI 365X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is bad in law as well as on facts. 2. For that the Ld. CIT (A) erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte without allowing the appellant any proper and reasonable opportunity of being heard. 3. For that the Ld. CIT (A) erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte by stating that the assessee have not complied to hearing notice(s) in spite of the fact, assessee have duly requesting adjournment on 29.11.2022. 4. For that the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) is bad in law since the ld. CIT(A) has not decided the issues ground wise in respect of the grounds raised by the appellant in the Memo of Appeal. 5. For that the Ld. CIT (A) is bad in law since the order passed is not any speaking order nor the CIT(A) has looked into the assessment records ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the assessment year in question but subsequently, the assessee did not appear before the AO, therefore, he framed assessment order u/s 143(3)/144 of the Act by making an addition of Rs. 1,73,40,926/- from the business and by doing so it was calculated @8% of the total turnover of Rs. 21,67,61,571/-. The ld. AO while doing so he did not rejected the books of account filed by the assessee and framed the assessment at Rs. 1,74,96,720/- which further included an addition of Rs. 1,55,791/- income from other sources on account of interest income. 3. Dissatisfied with the above order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) where the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed. 4. Aggrieved by the above order, assessee preferred ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... comply before them and therefore, ground no. 1 to 5 are dismissed. 8. As regards, ground no. 6 and 7, it is contended that both the lower authorities erred in estimating the profit @ 10% of the turnover without rejecting books of accounts of assessee and secondly net profit rate applied @ 8% is excessive. We are aware of the fact that both the impugned orders are ex-parte but since the issue is only with regard to estimation of profits and since books of accounts of the assessee are regularly audited and have been accepted by the revenue authorities in the past from setting aside the issue on merits to the lower authority and decided to adjudicate here itself. We find that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of trad ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
