2018 (3) TMI 2012

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - HELD THAT:- It is seen that the appellant had declared the value of the imported goods, based upon the transaction value entered between him and the foreign supplier. The said transaction value does not stand accepted by Revenue on the basis of doubt entertained by them, resulting in conducting of market survey in India and rejecting the declared value of subject goods. It is well settled law t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... None For Respondent : M.K. Mall, Assistant Commissioner (AR) ORDER 1. On matter being called nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant nor is there any adjournment request in spite of today's notice of hearing having been sent well in advance. Accordingly, we have heard Learned Authorised Representative appearing for Revenue and have gone through the impugned order. 2. As per .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The said order was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) and hence the present appeal. 3. It is seen that the appellant had declared the value of the imported goods, based upon the transaction value entered between him and the foreign supplier. The said transaction value does not stand accepted by Revenue on the basis of doubt entertained by them, resulting in conducting of market survey in Ind .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X