9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (11) TMI 174X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r filing the reply - grievance of the Appellant is that the petition which runs into 2059 pages, a reasonable time was required for filing the reply and on 26.10.2023 time was allowed for reply and matter was adjourned to 30.10.2023 which was insufficient for filing a reply - HELD THAT:- In facts of the present case, there are no reason to entertain the Appeal and keep it pending. Learned Counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ha, Mr. Rathina Maravarman, Advocates. ORDER Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as Counsel appearing for the Central Bank of India. 2. This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 18.10.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Court-V, Mumbai Bench, which order records:- None for the Respondent despite service. The Counsel for t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er was adjourned to 30.10.2023 and now both the parties submits that the matter was fixed for 06.11.2023 but it was not shown in the list. 6. The grievance of the Appellant is that the petition which runs into 2059 pages, a reasonable time was required for filing the reply and on 26.10.2023 time was allowed for reply and matter was adjourned to 30.10.2023 which was insufficient for filing a rep ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
